Too bad they waited until the House was soaked in the blood of hundred of thousands of people.
http://wonkette.com/politics/9%252f11/presumption-of-criminality-kept-bush-cheney-from-sworn-911-testimony-246789.php
In the context of the Bush regime's refusal to allow its top capos to testify on the U.S. Attorney issue, a reporter asks Tony Snow about Cheney's refusal to disclose the people on his energy council, and about the refusal of Bush and Cheney to testify under oath about 9/11.
The below exchange is very interesting. Snow talks about a "presumption of criminality," and gets called on it.
Q You used the word "avoid." There is an avoidance, it seems, of this administration to sit down and talk on the record, under oath, about critical issues.
MR. SNOW: What you're saying is that every time somebody wants to try to mount a charge you ought to be able to get hauled up and testify under oath, with a presumption of criminality, rather than a presumption of goodwill. I'm not going to buy that.
Q Was it criminal, 9/11 -- was that criminal?
MR. SNOW: No. What I'm saying is that the 9/11 Commission, we participated fully.
Snow had to be rescued from his consciousness-of-guilt moment by a "question" alleging that Democrats are using the U.S. Attorney issue to cover up a proposed tax increase.You can link to the Red House website's transcript and video of the press conference from Wonkette's website. Not from here.
1 comment:
quite intriguing!
Post a Comment